For this week, Anchored Instruction Environments truly provided a flashback to the previous week. I can strongly see the similarities as outlined within the slide show regarding Situated Learning and PBL. While I do feel this is more reflective of Goal Based Scenarios, I do feel that this model does strongly support academic achievement and comprehension amongst students. What sticks out as most beneficial correlates most with the idea of embedded data. By including the information and aligning learning to the steps similar to a story, I feel students would have an increased desire to complete a lesson. The struggle here would be how to correlate each lesson to fit into a storyline format.
I would use this model for a potential lesson with my students. Due to the various subjects in which I currently teach, I am unable to narrow down a specific lesson that can actually implement this model. I feel that taking the time out to develop a marketing story may not be the easiest task to take on. If I were in a situation where I could provide a to-do list or review the steps of a Marketing Plan, I could see this happening. Other than that option...NO. I feel that rather than modifying the model, I would have to refer back to the GBS or PBL model instead. While I do feel the discussion elements are vital and important, the extension concept is what truly makes me want to test this model within a classroom.
Similarly to the GBS model, I see using a website to teach the students. Here, the website would provide a template of what students would need to complete. I feel this would almost mimic a scavenger hunt of some sort, yet provide the videos as suggested in the slideshow would be vital. Having them create individual projects online via a website would essentially provide the independent element of thinking. The application of knowledge would truly have to be reflective of the content that is later developed and presented via the webpage that is ultimately submitted for a grade.
I agree that anchored instruction bears resemblance to GBS, PBL, and situated learning, perhaps requiring an even more elaborate, intensive development process. The anchored instruction programs discussed in our readings were developed by a specialized group, not necessarily the instructors. I think it would be extremely daunting for teachers to develop the program on their own. Plus, creativity takes time. If teachers are not considered experts in certain lessons, it would be difficult to create an elaborate story that is interesting the students, provides accurate, meaningful information and directs students towards specific learning goals. For instance, I'm rather weak in Chinese history and would have trouble creating an anchored instruction program around that subject without the help of an expert and resources.
ReplyDelete