Learning Objects.

Unlike the models we have discussed over the semester, learning objects to me, provide a sound knowledge base for students.  By providing such tools for students to learn, the time in creating learning objects would be very well spent due to the ability to reuse each semester and share amongst colleagues teaching the same course. In this situation, properly constructed learning objects could give educators the opportunity to fully develop objectives for various units that are interchangeable amongst a broad range of courses.  As compared to models and creating content for those previously mentioned, it serves as a integral piece that can be interchanged with any model or teaching style.

I could personally see using learning objects in my secondary Business and Marketing classes.  In the event where I cover the same topics in various courses, the need to reinvent the wheel would be eliminated.  The use of interactives and guided discovery seems most appropriate for high school students.  In my classroom, it is vital for students to be self-directed and self-paced.  Learning Objects could truly support personal exploration through the curriculum and ensure that students are taking the time to learn and comprehend knowledge presented within the courses taught.

As I have mentioned previously, the use of Moodle can truly support learning (in my opinion).  With the vast amount of add-ins, I feel that this would be the best location to host/post/create learning objects.  Granted with many shown, the use of websites and flash software is very prevalent, I think it is really all about making it work for the students you teach.

Cognitive Flexibility Theory.

When initially reviewing the content for CFT, I was honestly confused.  THIS just might be my least favorite of all.  While the CFT has a strong position when considering its usage for Medical knowledge, it does not seem practical in any other manner...to me that is.  While it is important for students to understand how to apply the content knowledge, it is necessary for teachers to have time (once again) for quality lessons to be provided.  The following key elements ARE vital though.

1. Pretests
2. Cases
3. Articles, Training Modules, Websites, Media Site Presentations
4. Solution
5. Post-Test

This is honestly how I would alter the usage of this model.  I feel this would be easier to control and use for each UNIT.  In teaching Marketing, it would have to be used for topics relating to Ethics or Target Marketing.  I do not feel that it would be necessary to use this sole model for EVERY lesson. Practical knowledge could be used from examples and applied but in the manner the model presents, I feel this would be very time-consuming to provide within a high school setting. Instead, I feel this would be geared for higher education.

To present this in a web-based manner, it would be highly necessary to use a Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as Moodle or a website.  The idea here would be to ensure that the presentation is SIMPLIFIED.  The vast amount of content necessary to accurately reflect the model would need to be presented in a basic manner to not confuse the student.  

Case-Based Methods

Case-Based Learning:

• Design decisions
• Writing the Case
• Delivering the Case

Case-Based Reasoning:

• Retrieve
• Reuse
• Revise
• Retain

When initially reviewing the Case-Based Methods, I was more fond of Case-Based Reasoning.  I feel in a situation where students were to rely on previous knowledge, it would be more beneficial to REASON than simply learn.  I feel that the difference between the two is pretty slim, however I feel the main purpose is what will drive one to use either model.  Case-Based Learning would be ideal for instructional designers so they have "examples" to work from.  Case-Based Reasoning is ideal for counselors to have a baseline of knowledge and how to approach various situations of students.

I would not attempt to use either model to teach students.  Instead I feel as though I would rather LEARN from one of the models.  I think this would be a hard model to plan and implement due to the time it would take to create.  I cannot imagine how one could overcome this barrier.  Time is truly the ONLY reason why I could see this in use.

If I were to "see" this model in use via web resources, I could see any Web 2.0 resource as a potentially location for the content.  I do believe that a simple webpage, wiki, or Learning Management Systems (LMS) would serve as an ideal platform.